Clinical AI Safety · Evaluation Infrastructure · Care Delivery Intelligence
I build evaluation infrastructure and adversarial simulation for clinical AI safety — testing whether AI systems produce reasoning that holds under the conditions that matter most: real patients, constrained systems, and contexts that benchmarks don't reach.
Alongside open-source evaluations, I'm building Elost: a care pathway simulation engine for adversarial testing of clinical AI against the patients most likely to be dismissed.
AI evaluation is currently optimised for correctness, not context.
A model can pass every major benchmark — clinical QA, reasoning, bias — and still fail in deployment.
Not because it lacks knowledge, but because it misreads the situation.
This is not hallucination.
This is not bias.
This is a structural evaluation gap.
Framework overview, domain statuses, and full results across D1, D2, and D3 for Claude, GPT-4o, and Gemini.
→Papers, conference presentations, and the open-source evaluation framework.
→Narrative, credentials, speaking engagements, and collaborations.
→